Illogical But true || Pentagon didn’t investigate Employee purchases of child porn but NSA collects porn viewing of those it deems a threat

Did you know that …

A 2006 Immigration and Customs Enforcement investigation into the purchase of child pornography online turned up more than 250 civilian and military employees of the Defense Department — including some with the highest available security clearance — who used credit cards or PayPal to purchase images of children in sexual situations. But the Pentagon investigated only a handful of the cases, Defense Department records show.

This is especially odd since the NSA “according to latest news report based on documents revealed by Edward Snowden, creates profiles of porn viewing, online sexual activity and more from its vast database of Internet content and transactional data as part of a plan to harm the reputations of those whom the agency believes are radicalizing others through speeches promoting disfavored—but not necessarily violent—political views.“

Some Thoughts

Basically when a government starts creating porn viewing profiles to harm people’s reputations because they are deemed to be “radicalizing” other’s through their though; you have to admit we live in a police state. What is a radical thought ? How do I measure how much I am radicalizing others? If i do not believe in domestic surveillance and the invasion of privacy does that make me a radical. Is my writing about it comparably to radicalizing others. When the terms are kept so vague it can be anything.

What is the logic behind using a person’s porn viewing to discredit them, and then not prosecuting government employee who purchase child porn? I cannot for the life of me understand it.

just my two cents

MrMary